<![CDATA[Has Google seriously just silently killed the "inurl:" search operator?!]]>Has Google seriously just silently killed the "inurl:" search operator?! WTF?? 🤬

]]>https://forum.other.li/topic/ae402dd1-778a-408c-930f-9c9d7aaf4c97/has-google-seriously-just-silently-killed-the-inurl-search-operatorRSS for NodeSat, 30 May 2026 13:51:53 GMTTue, 12 May 2026 14:37:38 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Has Google seriously just silently killed the "inurl:" search operator?! on Tue, 12 May 2026 16:33:20 GMT]]>@viennawriter I claim Agent Refactoring @n0kovo @pluralistic

]]>https://forum.other.li/post/https://chaos.social/users/monkee/statuses/116562565531110933https://forum.other.li/post/https://chaos.social/users/monkee/statuses/116562565531110933Tue, 12 May 2026 16:33:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Has Google seriously just silently killed the "inurl:" search operator?! on Tue, 12 May 2026 16:32:29 GMT]]>@n0kovo You shall all ask every question to the Great Garbage Lying Machine from now on!

]]>https://forum.other.li/post/https://chaos.social/users/monkee/statuses/116562562204857834https://forum.other.li/post/https://chaos.social/users/monkee/statuses/116562562204857834Tue, 12 May 2026 16:32:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Has Google seriously just silently killed the "inurl:" search operator?! on Tue, 12 May 2026 16:00:07 GMT]]>@n0kovo wot! 😬

]]>https://forum.other.li/post/https://ioc.exchange/users/annehargreaves/statuses/116562434962261901https://forum.other.li/post/https://ioc.exchange/users/annehargreaves/statuses/116562434962261901Tue, 12 May 2026 16:00:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Has Google seriously just silently killed the "inurl:" search operator?! on Tue, 12 May 2026 15:40:54 GMT]]>@n0kovo site: still works though. Not great but better than none of it working

]]>https://forum.other.li/post/https://mastodon.social/users/avarisclari/statuses/116562359361353894https://forum.other.li/post/https://mastodon.social/users/avarisclari/statuses/116562359361353894Tue, 12 May 2026 15:40:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Has Google seriously just silently killed the "inurl:" search operator?! on Tue, 12 May 2026 15:39:44 GMT]]>@n0kovo @pluralistic Not only that one, it seems. A lot of didn’t work any more the other day.

]]>https://forum.other.li/post/https://literatur.social/users/viennawriter/statuses/116562354786073182https://forum.other.li/post/https://literatur.social/users/viennawriter/statuses/116562354786073182Tue, 12 May 2026 15:39:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Has Google seriously just silently killed the "inurl:" search operator?! on Tue, 12 May 2026 15:05:52 GMT]]>@christopherkunz @n0kovo I think you can still use `site:`

]]>https://forum.other.li/post/https://social.data.coop/users/benjaoming/statuses/116562221628416795https://forum.other.li/post/https://social.data.coop/users/benjaoming/statuses/116562221628416795Tue, 12 May 2026 15:05:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Has Google seriously just silently killed the "inurl:" search operator?! on Tue, 12 May 2026 14:39:06 GMT]]>@n0kovo Uhm yeah, looks like it. domain: doesn't work anymore, either. It just searches for the word "domain" instead of _on_ that domain.

I am starting to feel like those tech companies are taking all the writing by @pluralistic about enshittification as an encouragement, not a criticism.

]]>https://forum.other.li/post/https://chaos.social/users/christopherkunz/statuses/116562116385577592https://forum.other.li/post/https://chaos.social/users/christopherkunz/statuses/116562116385577592Tue, 12 May 2026 14:39:06 GMT