Today Anthropic joins the Blender Development Fund as corporate sponsor.

[Gast]

@Blender please clarify if this is reparations for the art community, and condemn these war criminals at Anthrop*c.

[Gast]

@Blender look, the problem is not the tone.

[Gast]

@Blender adios

[Gast]

@Blender Well I guess you walked right into that huge pile of with open eyes and with every intention to actually flop down on your belly and roll around in it while it's still warm and steamy. Enjoy!

[Gast]

@Blender I am surprised to see that a beloved tool by artists is accepting money from a plagiarism-as-a-service company, which is hurting that community so much. This an impressive way to alienate your users and art-loving donors.
I'll avoid using anything coming by an Anthropic booster, which is what Blender is becoming by having its logo on their page. It seems I'll need to look for an alternative software which respects their community

[Gast]

@Blender <everybody disliked that>

[Gast]

@Blender Oh god! They got Blender too! NOOOOOO! You bastards! *falls to the ground crying*

[Gast]

@Blender Boo!

[dannotdaniel@hellions.cloud]

@ratking @Blender this

[Gast]

@Blender I understand that funding an open source project like Blender is a challenge but you do have choice who you want to associate with. This decision is more than disappointing. I have supported Blender for years through contributions to the development fund and with my work on the bug tracker a couple years back. It has been a shining example for an open source project that I have recommended to everyone. This crosses a red line for me and I will be stopping my contribution to the development fund. I hope you take the community feedback to heart, reverse the decision, and establish a better policy that considers ethical aspects about who you're taking money from.

[Gast]

@Blender well now I know never to use Blender for anything. Thanks for the heads up!

[Gast]

@Blender you should be ashamed.
Of course I uninstalled your software.

[Gast]

@Blender regardless of what your funding policy might say, accepting funding from such an infamous company that is so widely hated specifically by your user base is not a good idea.

And honestly I also find it short-sighted, given the massive bubble and constant bleed of money these companies have. Gaining long term unpopularity for what I believe will likely be short term funding seems like a poor strategy to take.

I think everyone would have been much happier if the headline was "Blender rejects funding from Anthropic", even better if it was followed by another headline saying "Blender drafts new AI policy prohibiting the use of genAI for its development process".

[Gast]

@Blender rolls eyes clearly the problem is you're not selling the peons on taking the money from them enough, riiiiiight

[Gast]

@Blender This is a bad deal. I hope you know that. I understand you need the financial support, but this is seriously eating at the user base trust. You WILL lose users.

[Gast]

@Blender so y'all were like "I can't imagine anyone who uses blender would be upset that a business determined to steal their work and jobs would be pissed off at this news. Let's announce this. Everyone will love it!".
But you do you.

[Gast]

it's nice that y'all are liking my post but Blender doesn't get to see that. You either have to voice your own outrage or retoot mine. Just pressing the star doesn't have any effect.

[Gast]

@Blender Fuck. No.

[Gast]

@miss_rodent @Blender Well said. I just want to comment with all the traction this is getting, this isn’t it guys. It’s photography, it’s graphic art, it’s business, it’s jobs, it’s every nook and cranny you look and despite being told otherwise tech is bleeding people. If this gets more people thinking that’s great, because the tech has been here redifining human worth for a while now.

[Gast]

@Blender SHAME