Skip to content
  • Kategorien
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Beliebt
  • World
  • Benutzer
  • Gruppen
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Standard: (Kein Skin)
  • Kein Skin
Einklappen

other.li Forum

  1. Übersicht
  2. Uncategorized
  3. πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
82 BeitrΓ€ge 55 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Γ„lteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelΓΆscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten kΓΆnnen es sehen.
  • ? Gast

    @alice a friend of mine changed his middle name to 'undefined', it caused so many problems he had to change it back within a year.

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Gast
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #28

    @TheMightyGit @alice
    Reminds me of someone who had the last name "Null" and had similar problems.

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

      The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

      Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

      Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

      Using VPNs set to different locations.

      Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

      Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

      If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Gast
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #29

      @alice

      Wrt #PII, It might be a good idea to avoid entering data easily identifiable as trash, and use generators instead. E.g.:

      • FauxID
      • Fake Name Generator
      alice@lgbtqia.spaceA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • ? Gast

        @alice I've toyed with the idea of setting up a headless Chrome instance to just ask "but why?" to ChatGPT all day to drive up their inference costs. πŸ‘€

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Gast
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #30

        @theorangetheme @alice

        'and then?'

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

          πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Gast
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #31

          @alice

          yes, yes, a thousand times, yes!

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

            The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

            Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

            Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

            Using VPNs set to different locations.

            Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

            Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

            If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Gast
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #32

            This is the way. I've been doing this since 1997.

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

              πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Gast
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #33

              @alice

              *keeps Data in a safe place far away from Alice*

              #FullyFunctionalAndProgrammedInMultipleTechniques #FullyFunctional

              ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

                Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

                Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

                Using VPNs set to different locations.

                Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

                Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

                If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Gast
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #34

                @alice Non-tech-savvy question:
                Is there something special about 1970-01-01, or is it just an example of an arbitrary incorrect birthdate? Would it foul things up just as much if I entered, say, 1984-04-01?

                ? ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                0
                • ? Gast

                  @alice

                  *keeps Data in a safe place far away from Alice*

                  #FullyFunctionalAndProgrammedInMultipleTechniques #FullyFunctional

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Gast
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #35

                  @miguelpergamon @alice No need for poison, just....Data is too valuable, so we're going to substitute the discount version, Ensign Anecdote.

                  ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • ? Gast

                    @miguelpergamon @alice No need for poison, just....Data is too valuable, so we're going to substitute the discount version, Ensign Anecdote.

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Gast
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #36

                    @madengineering @alice

                    Ensign Anecdote told me fae met Alice once ... at a lock in ...

                    ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • ? Gast

                      @madengineering @alice

                      Ensign Anecdote told me fae met Alice once ... at a lock in ...

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Gast
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #37

                      @miguelpergamon @alice Yes, but he also recommended eating rocks because he found this one blog somewhere, so you'll have to forgive me for being a little skeptical of everything he says.

                      ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • ? Gast

                        @miguelpergamon @alice Yes, but he also recommended eating rocks because he found this one blog somewhere, so you'll have to forgive me for being a little skeptical of everything he says.

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Gast
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #38

                        @madengineering @alice

                        We all get cravings!

                        ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • ? Gast

                          @alice Non-tech-savvy question:
                          Is there something special about 1970-01-01, or is it just an example of an arbitrary incorrect birthdate? Would it foul things up just as much if I entered, say, 1984-04-01?

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Gast
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #39

                          @Gorfram @alice 1970-01-01 is the first date (Unix)computers start to count from and as such a system often falls back to it when no data is available.

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • ? Gast

                            @madengineering @alice

                            We all get cravings!

                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Gast
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #40

                            @miguelpergamon @alice That's different, that guy's got superpowers.

                            ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                              πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Gast
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #41

                              @alice How do?

                              alice@lgbtqia.spaceA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • ? Gast

                                @miguelpergamon @alice That's different, that guy's got superpowers.

                                ? Offline
                                ? Offline
                                Gast
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #42

                                @madengineering @alice

                                #MotivationalSpeech

                                We ALL have superpowers, darling, we just have to look within. πŸ’œ

                                *looks within ... urgh 🀒*

                                (Also, there were those two guys from Let This Be Your Last Battlefield or whatever that Half-Black episode was called.)

                                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                                  πŸ‘ Poison πŸ‘ your πŸ‘ data ☠️

                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Gast
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #43

                                  @alice Oh, I'm here right to poison minds.

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                                    @Irenetherogue sure! There are low tech ways to do itβ€”just lie...to every corporation, app, and marketer you can. Make it plausible, but wrong.

                                    Bonus: include something wildly implausible once in a while. It makes folx more likely to overlook the subtle ones.

                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    Gast
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #44

                                    @alice @Irenetherogue

                                    Haha, you'd like my mother, the guerilla witch. She makes customer cards in every shop and switches them then with other people, bonus points if both have a strongly different consumer profile.

                                    When she's bored, she responds maliciously questionnaires of evil corporations.

                                    She studied psychology and statistics and says "it is anyway horribly difficult to get useful answers out of these marketing datasets, why not make it a bit harder for them?" 😈.

                                    alice@lgbtqia.spaceA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                                      The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

                                      Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

                                      Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

                                      Using VPNs set to different locations.

                                      Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

                                      Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

                                      If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Gast
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #45

                                      RE: https://toot.community/@openculture/116259749175404044

                                      @alice https://mastodon.world/@openculture@toot.community/116259749462141780

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                                        The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

                                        Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

                                        Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

                                        Using VPNs set to different locations.

                                        Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

                                        Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

                                        If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Gast
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #46

                                        @alice got to show my ignorance here, but how do I find which brokers have my info?!

                                        alice@lgbtqia.spaceA 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                                          The goal is to make corporate data less profitable.

                                          Even stuff as simple as setting your birthdate to 1970-01-01 everywhere, adding [TEST] or [DELETED] as your name or account notes anywhere you don't need them to know your name.

                                          Using plugins like AdNauseam to poison ad trackers (and cost them marketing dollars).

                                          Using VPNs set to different locations.

                                          Signing into data broker sites to "correct" outdated info (they'll often let you do that with little-to-no proof of identity, but will require your passport or state ID in order to delete your info). Bonus points if you correct it to someone else's info on their site that's similar to yours.

                                          Only fill in required fields when you sign up for anything, but only provide correct info if it matters for you to use the service, otherwise provide plausible, but incorrect, data.

                                          If you use LLMs anywhere, use the free tier and always vote thumbs up for bad answers and down for good ones. It wastes their resources and drives up their costs while making their training data worse.

                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Gast
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #47

                                          @alice

                                          I've been using mobile phone numbers from the list of numbers reserved for creative works (in Australia), when a form requires me to enter a phone number.

                                          https://www.acma.gov.au/phone-numbers-use-tv-shows-films-and-creative-works

                                          ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Γ„lteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen


                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Kategorien
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Beliebt
                                          • World
                                          • Benutzer
                                          • Gruppen