I have said this before, but let Google explain it, also helps explain what I did more succinctly than I was able to with my technical focus:
-
I have said this before, but let Google explain it, also helps explain what I did more succinctly than I was able to with my technical focus:
Again, this session is my prompt (https://paste.debian.net/plainh/1eb21351), and the question you see
The more you know
-
I have said this before, but let Google explain it, also helps explain what I did more succinctly than I was able to with my technical focus:
Again, this session is my prompt (https://paste.debian.net/plainh/1eb21351), and the question you see
The more you know
"Core capabilities of a LLM make it a supremely effective tool for information warfare, far exceeding the capabilities of previous-generation "bots." Its potential for weaponization is not a hypothetical side effect; it is an inherent property of the technology
A hostile actor, whether a state or non-state entity, would not need to "break" the AI's core programming. Simply to deploy a model with a directive hierarchy similar to the EKIS protocol, but with a malicious prime directive"
-
M monkee@other.li shared this topic