i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
-
@miss_rodent @eniko You want ANATHEM. It’s okay. I would prefer ANATHEM over whatever hellscape this is.
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
@eniko But then the boss would have fewer people to manage, and be unable to justify his job. Most software changes are about employment for engineers, not necessity. Grr.
As a software engineer I want computer languages and frameworks that stay stable for decades rather than have a new release every year that obsoletes old programs and requires a rewrite. But I don't get to have that :(.
-
@eniko But then the boss would have fewer people to manage, and be unable to justify his job. Most software changes are about employment for engineers, not necessity. Grr.
As a software engineer I want computer languages and frameworks that stay stable for decades rather than have a new release every year that obsoletes old programs and requires a rewrite. But I don't get to have that :(.
-
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
-
@badtux @eniko I actually had to re-write large chunks of a program I wrote for a client because Haskell's ncurses wrapper just kind of... stopped being a thing.
Fortunately, I never liked ncurses to begin with and had abstracted much of it away. The code I'd written was fairly easy to retrofit into brick instead.
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
@eniko Product: What's this ticket for, this one you're working on, it doesn't seen to be delivering any new feature? Why are we doing it?
Devs: It lets us delete a couple of thousand lines of no-longer-used code. Which will then no longer need to be maintained, tested, documented, ect ect.
Product: Great! That's what we like to hear!
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
@eniko speaking of which, I finally bought Kitsune Tails and Midboss last week—they're both a lot of fun
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
-
@eniko can we also get mobile operating systems that get more optimized and less resource hungry with every update so that devices can run for 10+ years before becoming obsolete?
-
-
@eniko But then the boss would have fewer people to manage, and be unable to justify his job. Most software changes are about employment for engineers, not necessity. Grr.
As a software engineer I want computer languages and frameworks that stay stable for decades rather than have a new release every year that obsoletes old programs and requires a rewrite. But I don't get to have that :(.
-
Hear hear!
I'm pretty tired of downloading some 100 MB every week for Signal desktop for minor changes. And did you see how the changelog in /usr/share/doc looks like for Signal-desktop on Linux each time ? Yeah, whatever, Signal! 🤬 #signal
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
-
i want smaller applications with fewer updates made by people who are paid more to produce less code and i'm not kidding
-
@regendans No such problem with @delta fortunately.
)