"Memory safe languages are the future"
-
"Memory safe languages are the future"
Yeah! And also the past!
I know you've forgotten languages other than Rust exist but the lisp family of languages have been embodying memory safety for over 60 years now
-
"Memory safe languages are the future"
Yeah! And also the past!
I know you've forgotten languages other than Rust exist but the lisp family of languages have been embodying memory safety for over 60 years now
-
"Memory safe languages are the future"
Yeah! And also the past!
I know you've forgotten languages other than Rust exist but the lisp family of languages have been embodying memory safety for over 60 years now
@cwebber how is lisp at performance these days?
because i imagine that "rust is memory-safe" is only part of the reason why it's so popular now, the other one being "and it's also capable of being as fast, perhaps even more so, as C/C++"
-
@defuneste @deech
here you go -
@cwebber how is lisp at performance these days?
because i imagine that "rust is memory-safe" is only part of the reason why it's so popular now, the other one being "and it's also capable of being as fast, perhaps even more so, as C/C++"
@rnd Rust is on average slower than C in most benchmarks I have seen?
-
@cwebber how is lisp at performance these days?
because i imagine that "rust is memory-safe" is only part of the reason why it's so popular now, the other one being "and it's also capable of being as fast, perhaps even more so, as C/C++"
-
@rnd Rust is on average slower than C in most benchmarks I have seen?
@cwebber@social.coop @rnd@toot.cat imean it really depends ? the same program writtwn in rust and c and xompiled with rustc and clang should give pretty much the same executable ?
