Skip to content
  • Kategorien
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Beliebt
  • World
  • Benutzer
  • Gruppen
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Standard: (Kein Skin)
  • Kein Skin
Einklappen

other.li Forum

  1. Übersicht
  2. Uncategorized
  3. Reading 'Empire of AI' by Karen Hao.

Reading 'Empire of AI' by Karen Hao.

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
openaisagi
4 Beiträge 1 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Gast
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #1

    Reading 'Empire of AI' by Karen Hao.

    2 things stand out in the first 3 chapters alone:

    1) From #OpenAIs new 2018 for-profit charter this definition of #AGI: "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work"

    2) From Karen's interview that same year OpenAIs reasoning for wanting to build AGI: "We think it can help solve complex problems that are just out of reach of humans" - like climate change and health care.

    ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • ? Gast

      Reading 'Empire of AI' by Karen Hao.

      2 things stand out in the first 3 chapters alone:

      1) From #OpenAIs new 2018 for-profit charter this definition of #AGI: "highly autonomous systems that outperform humans at most economically valuable work"

      2) From Karen's interview that same year OpenAIs reasoning for wanting to build AGI: "We think it can help solve complex problems that are just out of reach of humans" - like climate change and health care.

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Gast
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #2

      The first is crazy silly. I mean why limit this to 'economically valuable' work? That just says all it could possibly say about their limited mindset. It's ridiculous.

      The second is actually more silly still, because they say they need AGI (which does not yet exist) because of how inhumane the health care system is organized in the US.

      A quote: "Look at how important health care is in the US, as a political issue these days. How do we actually get better treatment for people? At lower cost?"

      ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • ? Gast

        The first is crazy silly. I mean why limit this to 'economically valuable' work? That just says all it could possibly say about their limited mindset. It's ridiculous.

        The second is actually more silly still, because they say they need AGI (which does not yet exist) because of how inhumane the health care system is organized in the US.

        A quote: "Look at how important health care is in the US, as a political issue these days. How do we actually get better treatment for people? At lower cost?"

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Gast
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #3

        To which I would answer: Just make it free for all by implementing a human-centered health care system that allows everyone access to health care, similar to what Europe has already done. Duh.
        But no, they think they need to build something (at great cost to the planet) that has never been build simply to solve a problem that is almost solved elsewhere on this planet right fucking now.
        How these men are considered geniuses is beyond me. Genius grifters perhaps.

        ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • ? Gast

          To which I would answer: Just make it free for all by implementing a human-centered health care system that allows everyone access to health care, similar to what Europe has already done. Duh.
          But no, they think they need to build something (at great cost to the planet) that has never been build simply to solve a problem that is almost solved elsewhere on this planet right fucking now.
          How these men are considered geniuses is beyond me. Genius grifters perhaps.

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Gast
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #4

          Basically these tech bros are a bunch of filthy rich men totally disconnected from real life and its challenges. They have somehow developed a view of themselves as people who can help humanity solve highly complex problems, but to do so they do not turn to solutions that are already available and sustainable, they only see one rather inefficient solution to all problems: they must accumulate more resources and build more data centers that need more water.

          I can't even.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • monkee@chaos.socialM monkee@chaos.social shared this topic
          Antworten
          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
          Anmelden zum Antworten
          • Älteste zuerst
          • Neuste zuerst
          • Meiste Stimmen


          • Anmelden

          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
          • Erster Beitrag
            Letzter Beitrag
          0
          • Kategorien
          • Aktuell
          • Tags
          • Beliebt
          • World
          • Benutzer
          • Gruppen