Skip to content
  • Kategorien
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Beliebt
  • World
  • Benutzer
  • Gruppen
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Standard: (Kein Skin)
  • Kein Skin
Einklappen

other.li Forum

  1. Übersicht
  2. Uncategorized
  3. RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
175 Beiträge 120 Kommentatoren 21 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • ? Gast

    @gherhartd @inthehands Use Brave browser and Brave search, or equivalent, might be one way

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Gast
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #144

    @commons_protocol Brave is just Google Chrome in a fancy overcoat - it's still contributing to Google's dominance over the web (even if you ignore the other problems with it)

    ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • ? Gast

      Defeatism is a form of surrender. Cynicism is surrender. Despair is surrender. Nihilism is surrender.

      Our job is to •care• and to •keep caring• and to •keep doing and keep building• and to •endure• longer than them.

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Gast
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #145

      @inthehands

      our mission, for those who accept it, is to go out there and care about ourselves and each other enough to take our world and make it work for us all

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • ? Gast

        RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

        Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

        and •only because•

        they send people to our sites. •Our• sites, our words, with our design, with our links, with our context and our aesthetics, shared the way we want to share them.

        Google is announcing — unambiguously and with great fanfare — that they are now fully breaking that already-ragged contract. We should reciprocate.

        1/2

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Gast
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #146

        @inthehands Google? Blocked.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • ? Gast

          RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

          Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

          and •only because•

          they send people to our sites. •Our• sites, our words, with our design, with our links, with our context and our aesthetics, shared the way we want to share them.

          Google is announcing — unambiguously and with great fanfare — that they are now fully breaking that already-ragged contract. We should reciprocate.

          1/2

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Gast
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #147

          @inthehands

          Do they not understand that websites consenting to have their pages indexed is the sole reason their LLM's even function? Without a constant source of new human writing, the only training data Google will have is the AI generated slop the internet has been filled with over the last four years.

          Soulless, empty webpages that take a mind-numbing amount of paragraphs to answer the most menial questions you can think of, all in excruciatingly little detail and utterly bland style. Merely filler for adspace, akin to the bit of fluff before a recipe, but without the intent.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • ? Gast

            @inthehands
            We need to get together a federated search index.

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Gast
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #148

            @Eurospoofer @inthehands

            Lets start now. How can I help?

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • ? Gast

              @commons_protocol Brave is just Google Chrome in a fancy overcoat - it's still contributing to Google's dominance over the web (even if you ignore the other problems with it)

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Gast
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #149

              @irina My understanding is that Brave is an independent instance and remains privacy focussed with an established, fully independent search index, remaining unaffected by Google's algorithmic updates or interface changes.

              I understand it uses its own distinct features and privacy-focused architecture, without adopting Google’s specific changes.

              Nevertheless, google has dominated the web for about 25 years already and I don't doubt there are systemic issues at foot either way and the whole sea is shifting!

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • ? Gast

                Quick strategy discussion, for those who understand Google indexing and SEO:

                If I want to yank a web site out of Google’s now-fully-extractive search, should I (1) disallow googlebot in robots.txt or (2) add `<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">` to all the page headers?

                The goal here is not just to remove my contributions to the commons from Google’s results, but to •make Google aware• that sites are pulling consent. What will best do that?

                2/2

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Gast
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #150

                @inthehands if you want to remove it immediately, as unintuative as it sounds, claiming ownership of the site in Google Search Console will allow you to remove any URL in their index from being included in results, but only temporarily. I think you have to renew the exclude every 45 days or something link that. If a random blog excludes their content, it won't impact Google at all. If Wikipedia were to do that, the trust in the accuracy of Google's results would start to be impacted.

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • ? Gast

                  RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

                  Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

                  and •only because•

                  they send people to our sites. •Our• sites, our words, with our design, with our links, with our context and our aesthetics, shared the way we want to share them.

                  Google is announcing — unambiguously and with great fanfare — that they are now fully breaking that already-ragged contract. We should reciprocate.

                  1/2

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Gast
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #151

                  @inthehands
                  "Get in, loser. We're doing web rings again."

                  ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • ? Gast

                    @gherhartd @inthehands Use Brave browser and Brave search, or equivalent, might be one way

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Gast
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #152

                    @commons_protocol @gherhartd

                    Brave’s leadership is too personally despicable for me to consider their products

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • ? Gast

                      @inthehands My site is tiny, but I had to make sure and add that into my own. I don't care if Google never happens to come across it, the idea of them using my site to train their LLM is sickening.
                      I also have to say, your site is absolutely gorgeous.

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Gast
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #153

                      @goetic

                      Thank you!! My site is a labor of love, handmade from the ground up for the few people who will find it.

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • ? Gast

                        OK, a •lot• of replies need this reponse:

                        Yes, of •course• they will start ignoring robots.txt etc as soon as they think it hurts their business. Of course.

                        It is important to •force that fight•, rather than just capitulating in advance.

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Gast
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #154

                        @inthehands Google executives don't care about consent. Google executives care about their bottom line.

                        Copyright class action seems most promising. Along with adversarial material to poison their scrapers

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • ? Gast

                          RE: https://tldr.nettime.org/@tante/116605858023186072

                          Google Search rests on a social contract: their bots can crawl our sites, they can index our sites, and they can show excerpts of our sites because

                          and •only because•

                          they send people to our sites. •Our• sites, our words, with our design, with our links, with our context and our aesthetics, shared the way we want to share them.

                          Google is announcing — unambiguously and with great fanfare — that they are now fully breaking that already-ragged contract. We should reciprocate.

                          1/2

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Gast
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #155

                          @inthehands How to keep Google from indexing your website

                          Official docs from Google:
                          <https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/block-indexing>

                          Other ways:
                          <https://exertpro.com/how-can-i-keep-google-from-indexing-my-website/>

                          Other specific search engines may have their own tools for blocking their engine from indexing a web site or specific pages within it.

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • ? Gast

                            @inthehands
                            "Get in, loser. We're doing web rings again."

                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Gast
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #156

                            @jargoggles @inthehands finally my chance to join the "ate my balls" web ring

                            https://iowastatedaily.com/218801/uncategorized/eating-balls-on-the-internet/

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • ? Gast

                              OK, a •lot• of replies need this reponse:

                              Yes, of •course• they will start ignoring robots.txt etc as soon as they think it hurts their business. Of course.

                              It is important to •force that fight•, rather than just capitulating in advance.

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Gast
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #157

                              @inthehands In that case, it's better if we send them poisoned data instead, using iocaine [0] or nepentheses [1].

                              [0]: https://iocaine.madhouse-project.org
                              [1]: https://zadzmo.org/code/nepenthes/

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • ? Gast

                                Defeatism is a form of surrender. Cynicism is surrender. Despair is surrender. Nihilism is surrender.

                                Our job is to •care• and to •keep caring• and to •keep doing and keep building• and to •endure• longer than them.

                                ? Offline
                                ? Offline
                                Gast
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #158

                                @inthehands I needed to read this today.

                                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • ? Gast

                                  @inthehands this is a fence-post defense against this, google Will Not Care

                                  just start poisoning the data once you detect that google is the one fetching it, just absolutely fucking destroy their LLM output

                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Gast
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #159

                                  @ShadowJonathan @inthehands what if we honeypotted them? Get them to ingest gigabytes upon gigabytes of LLM generated text to ruin their.efforts?

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • ? Gast

                                    @inthehands you can block their bots at the network level

                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    Gast
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #160

                                    @glassresistor @inthehands are you doing this in a particular way? Basically looking for different approaches.

                                    ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • ? Gast

                                      Going with meta noindex for now. My thinking is that this actively tells Google to yank already-crawled content from their index, whereas they might take a robots.txt entry to mean “do not update, but keep showing last fetched.”

                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Gast
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #161

                                      @inthehands I found a google note on meta tag so saying that if you use robots.txt to exclude googlebot, it won’t be able to crawl your pages to honor noindex, so if another site google does index points to a page on your site, the link will still be indexed.

                                      https://developers.google.com/search/docs/crawling-indexing/block-indexing

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • ? Gast

                                        Defeatism is a form of surrender. Cynicism is surrender. Despair is surrender. Nihilism is surrender.

                                        Our job is to •care• and to •keep caring• and to •keep doing and keep building• and to •endure• longer than them.

                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Gast
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #162

                                        @inthehands annoy people into doing better.

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • ? Gast

                                          @inthehands As I said just a while ago: Every big tech press event these last few years have felt like "Announcing our exciting plans for oligarchs to strip-mine the entire world and immiserate all of humanity! Get on board, and also death to the unbelievers!"

                                          dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dogiedog64@app.wafrn.netD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von dogiedog64@app.wafrn.net
                                          #163

                                          @inthehands@hachyderm.io @datarama@hachyderm.io

                                          Here's how I've seen the response to Google's latest bullshit:

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen


                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Kategorien
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Beliebt
                                          • World
                                          • Benutzer
                                          • Gruppen