IT'S HAPPENING

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea This is why I'm migrating to hub hub.

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea

There are two nines in their uptime number!

No one said they had to be leading digits…

[mms@mastodon.bsd.cafe]

@RogerBW @0xabad1dea you're not cloud scale unless you're at 0 9s

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea aw hell yeah zero nines

[Gast]

I am going to once again clarify that a) this is an independent third party tracker b) it tracks ten subsystems and overlays all incidents on one timeline to arrive at the sub-90% overall reliability; it does not mean that the github site is just completely dead 10% of the time.

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea they can't gain three-9s through 99.9% so they are now course-correcting to three-9s through 89.99%

[aetios@sns.minovsky.space]

@0xabad1dea i see two nines here, we can do better microsoft

67%!!!!

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea God bless Microsoft

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea my self-hosted gitea has a higher uptime lmao

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea Hey, I count two nines.

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea 10x shitty. Ai is the future.

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea Maybe github management counts that as "two nines"'?

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea I mean, it also doesn’t _not_ say that

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea lmao

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea There's still two 9s in there. Depending on what or who that is counting, that is probably just fine.

[Gast]

@0xabad1dea sure as hell feels like it though