Skip to content
  • Kategorien
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Beliebt
  • World
  • Benutzer
  • Gruppen
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Standard: (Kein Skin)
  • Kein Skin
Einklappen

other.li Forum

  1. Übersicht
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's going on here?

What's going on here?

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
86 Beiträge 47 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

    UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Gast
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #40

    @mttaggart of course they did, but now they'll need to explain how they managed to let that get published

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

      UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Gast
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #41

      @mttaggart I suppose one thing you can say about old newspapers - no one can pretend an article was never printed

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

        UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

        catsalad@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        catsalad@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
        catsalad@infosec.exchange
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #42

        @mttaggart So it was a double slop article? -_-

        mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

          What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

          https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Gast
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #43

          @mttaggart https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

          mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • ? Gast

            @mttaggart https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

            mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
            mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
            mttaggart@infosec.exchange
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #44

            @drsbaitso Was just about to post this, thank you.

            ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

              @drsbaitso Was just about to post this, thank you.

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Gast
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #45

              @mttaggart Also, this is not a good situation. Ars has some serious explaining to do.

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Gast
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #46

                @mttaggart I happened to be reading in the comment section before the article got pulled.
                Here is Aurich's last post saying the article was pulled and they're going to be investigating, but there probably won't be any answers until Monday and they'll update readers then.

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • catsalad@infosec.exchangeC catsalad@infosec.exchange

                  @mttaggart So it was a double slop article? -_-

                  mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #47

                  @catsalad Slop on slop on slop. Literally.

                  ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                    UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Gast
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #48

                    @mttaggart Oh, I wish you'd gotten the comments too. I can only imagine what some familiar handles would have had to say in them.

                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • ? Gast

                      @mttaggart Oh, I wish you'd gotten the comments too. I can only imagine what some familiar handles would have had to say in them.

                      mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #49

                      @theotherbrook Someone else in these replies did!

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                        What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                        https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Gast
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #50

                        @mttaggart wow they pulled the article down

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • ? Gast

                          @mttaggart I got the comments though.

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Gast
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #51

                          @hackillu @mttaggart You got the comments online anywhere? I am dying to see them.

                          ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • ? Gast

                            @mttaggart jfc. As an Ars subscriber, I am furious

                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Gast
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #52

                            @jalefkowit @mttaggart Big same. Decades now.

                            They need to respond fast or I'm out.

                            ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • ? Gast

                              @jalefkowit @mttaggart Big same. Decades now.

                              They need to respond fast or I'm out.

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Gast
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #53

                              @j_s_j @mttaggart Aurich said in the comments that they are investigating, but probably won't have a response until Monday.

                              It had better be a good one

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • ? Gast

                                @hackillu @mttaggart You got the comments online anywhere? I am dying to see them.

                                ? Offline
                                ? Offline
                                Gast
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #54

                                @theotherbrook @mttaggart I just have a text file.

                                ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • ? Gast

                                  @theotherbrook @mttaggart I just have a text file.

                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Gast
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #55

                                  @theotherbrook @mttaggart the site wouldn't download, so i did copy paste

                                  ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • ? Gast

                                    @theotherbrook @mttaggart the site wouldn't download, so i did copy paste

                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    Gast
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #56

                                    @hackillu @mttaggart There's now a thread on the open forum.

                                    EDIT: Oh, but it's been locked. I've bumped heads with Aurich about some stuff but I do trust him to be pretty open when they are ready to talk about it.

                                    https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                      What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                                      https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Gast
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #57

                                      @mttaggart so, ars technica is now merely slop as well?

                                      ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                        This scoop brought to you by the TTI Intel Feed, which also routinely beats commercial threat intel to the punch on important emerging threats.

                                        https://intel.taggartinstitute.org/

                                        mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #58

                                        Putting this here so all can see it. Ars forum thread where the pull and investigation are mentioned: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

                                        mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • ? Gast

                                          @mttaggart Oh, I wish you'd gotten the comments too. I can only imagine what some familiar handles would have had to say in them.

                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Gast
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #59

                                          @theotherbrook @mttaggart it still exists in their forum.

                                          https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name.1511649/

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen


                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Kategorien
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Beliebt
                                          • World
                                          • Benutzer
                                          • Gruppen