Skip to content
  • Kategorien
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Beliebt
  • World
  • Benutzer
  • Gruppen
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Standard: (Kein Skin)
  • Kein Skin
Einklappen

other.li Forum

  1. Übersicht
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's going on here?

What's going on here?

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
86 Beiträge 47 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

    UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Gast
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #46

    @mttaggart I happened to be reading in the comment section before the article got pulled.
    Here is Aurich's last post saying the article was pulled and they're going to be investigating, but there probably won't be any answers until Monday and they'll update readers then.

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • catsalad@infosec.exchangeC catsalad@infosec.exchange

      @mttaggart So it was a double slop article? -_-

      mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
      mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
      mttaggart@infosec.exchange
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #47

      @catsalad Slop on slop on slop. Literally.

      ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

        UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Gast
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #48

        @mttaggart Oh, I wish you'd gotten the comments too. I can only imagine what some familiar handles would have had to say in them.

        mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
        0
        • ? Gast

          @mttaggart Oh, I wish you'd gotten the comments too. I can only imagine what some familiar handles would have had to say in them.

          mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          mttaggart@infosec.exchange
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #49

          @theotherbrook Someone else in these replies did!

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

            What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

            https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Gast
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #50

            @mttaggart wow they pulled the article down

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • ? Gast

              @mttaggart I got the comments though.

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Gast
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #51

              @hackillu @mttaggart You got the comments online anywhere? I am dying to see them.

              ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • ? Gast

                @mttaggart jfc. As an Ars subscriber, I am furious

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Gast
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #52

                @jalefkowit @mttaggart Big same. Decades now.

                They need to respond fast or I'm out.

                ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • ? Gast

                  @jalefkowit @mttaggart Big same. Decades now.

                  They need to respond fast or I'm out.

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Gast
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #53

                  @j_s_j @mttaggart Aurich said in the comments that they are investigating, but probably won't have a response until Monday.

                  It had better be a good one

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • ? Gast

                    @hackillu @mttaggart You got the comments online anywhere? I am dying to see them.

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Gast
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #54

                    @theotherbrook @mttaggart I just have a text file.

                    ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • ? Gast

                      @theotherbrook @mttaggart I just have a text file.

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Gast
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #55

                      @theotherbrook @mttaggart the site wouldn't download, so i did copy paste

                      ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • ? Gast

                        @theotherbrook @mttaggart the site wouldn't download, so i did copy paste

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Gast
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #56

                        @hackillu @mttaggart There's now a thread on the open forum.

                        EDIT: Oh, but it's been locked. I've bumped heads with Aurich about some stuff but I do trust him to be pretty open when they are ready to talk about it.

                        https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                          What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                          https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Gast
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #57

                          @mttaggart so, ars technica is now merely slop as well?

                          ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                            This scoop brought to you by the TTI Intel Feed, which also routinely beats commercial threat intel to the punch on important emerging threats.

                            https://intel.taggartinstitute.org/

                            mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #58

                            Putting this here so all can see it. Ars forum thread where the pull and investigation are mentioned: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

                            mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • ? Gast

                              @mttaggart Oh, I wish you'd gotten the comments too. I can only imagine what some familiar handles would have had to say in them.

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Gast
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #59

                              @theotherbrook @mttaggart it still exists in their forum.

                              https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name.1511649/

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                Putting this here so all can see it. Ars forum thread where the pull and investigation are mentioned: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

                                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #60

                                Aaand the full comments thread from the original story: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name.1511649/

                                ? ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                  Putting this here so all can see it. Ars forum thread where the pull and investigation are mentioned: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Gast
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #61

                                  @mttaggart Locking the comments seems pretty... bad? I mean, one of their authors generated slop, and one of their editors approved slop. Is it more complicated or...? (I'm being a little flippant, but this is a terrible look for Ars already.)

                                  mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • ? Gast

                                    @mttaggart Locking the comments seems pretty... bad? I mean, one of their authors generated slop, and one of their editors approved slop. Is it more complicated or...? (I'm being a little flippant, but this is a terrible look for Ars already.)

                                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #62

                                    @theorangetheme I think the lock might be SOP for a pulled story. And mods tend not to like rampant speculation.

                                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                      What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                                      https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Gast
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #63

                                      @mttaggart

                                      AI isn't intended to be accurate, useful, or productive.

                                      It's just automated information pollution like Steve Bannon's version of Russian "flood the zone with sh*t" disinformation.
                                      https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/12/jeffrey-epstein-donald-trump-russia-emails-00648919

                                      https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article312917423.html

                                      https://www.bylinesupplement.com/p/in-putins-orbit-the-crypto-politics

                                      Look at the investors behind AI.

                                      Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE
                                      They don't have to fly planes into buildings anymore to destroy democracy & fry the planet.

                                      https://breakingdefense.com/2026/02/future-of-military-ai-in-saudi-arabia-ai-enhanced-or-ai-native/

                                      https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/27/technology/saudi-arabia-ai-exporter.html

                                      https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-11-06/saudis-plan-100-billion-ai-powerhouse-to-rival-uae-s-tech-hub

                                      1/

                                      ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • ? Gast

                                        @mttaggart

                                        AI isn't intended to be accurate, useful, or productive.

                                        It's just automated information pollution like Steve Bannon's version of Russian "flood the zone with sh*t" disinformation.
                                        https://www.politico.com/news/2025/11/12/jeffrey-epstein-donald-trump-russia-emails-00648919

                                        https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article312917423.html

                                        https://www.bylinesupplement.com/p/in-putins-orbit-the-crypto-politics

                                        Look at the investors behind AI.

                                        Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE
                                        They don't have to fly planes into buildings anymore to destroy democracy & fry the planet.

                                        https://breakingdefense.com/2026/02/future-of-military-ai-in-saudi-arabia-ai-enhanced-or-ai-native/

                                        https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/27/technology/saudi-arabia-ai-exporter.html

                                        https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-11-06/saudis-plan-100-billion-ai-powerhouse-to-rival-uae-s-tech-hub

                                        1/

                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Gast
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #64

                                        2/

                                        Russia & Putin
                                        Putin deluded himself that AI-enabled warfare will solve his manpower problems & population bottlenecks. 1.3 million dead soldiers so far in Ukraine.
                                        https://www.neimagazine.com/news/putin-links-nuclear-buildout-to-russias-ai-ambitions/

                                        https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/putin-wanted-ai-supremacy-now-russia-is-struggling-to-stay-in-the-race-0e0deeb6

                                        https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/how-technophobe-putin-led-russia-to-surrender-in-the-ai-arms-race-xk6hrn96l

                                        ? ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • ? Gast

                                          @aud very rude of him to fall off so strongly immediately after I defended his work to you

                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Gast
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #65

                                          @SnoopJ @aud it isn’t *quite* a milkshake duck in degree, but maybe in spirit

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen


                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Kategorien
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Beliebt
                                          • World
                                          • Benutzer
                                          • Gruppen