Skip to content
  • Kategorien
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Beliebt
  • World
  • Benutzer
  • Gruppen
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Standard: (Kein Skin)
  • Kein Skin
Einklappen

other.li Forum

  1. Übersicht
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's going on here?

What's going on here?

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
86 Beiträge 47 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • ? Gast

    @mttaggart i expect better from kyle; i do not trust benj edwards at all. between him and eric berger doing free pr for elon musk ars is in a sorry state right now

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Gast
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #75

    @bnys @mttaggart Berger is an embarassment

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

      UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Gast
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #76

      @mttaggart

      They surely pulled it and it now has their moonshark 404 page, the moonshark ate the AI slop.

      Edit: since the story itself was about an AI agent, we can dub this a clusterfuck.

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

        What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

        https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Gast
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #77

        @mttaggart

        More like ArseTechnica, am I right?

        @arstechnica

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • ? Gast

          @mttaggart ALAS, THE MOONSHARK HAS EATEN YOUR LINK.

          mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          mttaggart@infosec.exchange
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #78

          @inpc Keep reading the thread friendo

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

            Aaand the full comments thread from the original story: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name.1511649/

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Gast
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #79

            @mttaggart did you archive that?

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

              What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

              https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Gast
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #80

              @mttaggart@infosec.exchange dead internet theory is true again

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • ? Gast

                @mttaggart so, ars technica is now merely slop as well?

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Gast
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #81

                @mttaggart ah:

                We are doing an investigation right now to figure out exactly what happened. Given that it's Friday afternoon we probably won't have something to report back until Monday, but we will follow up with an explanation for our readers. Edit: Monday is a holiday, my bad, and I don't know what we'll be able to say, so I don't want to over-promise anything.

                OK, we’ll wait and see…

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                  What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                  https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Gast
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #82

                  @mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                  Hey remember in 2022 when
                  @arstechnica@mastodon.social published a story about a hoax which the source they used admitted was a hoax but they wrote the article as if it was real? That article is still up.
                  https://web.archive.org/web/20250921080857/https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/11/oculus-co-founder-makes-a-vr-headset-that-can-literally-kill-you/

                  RE: https://transfem.social/notes/ae7rksgrr9t400e0

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                    Aaand the full comments thread from the original story: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name.1511649/

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Gast
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #83

                    @mttaggart Fuck! I thought that was real

                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • ? Gast

                      @mttaggart Fuck! I thought that was real

                      mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #84

                      @staringatclouds The event is real. The quotes in the story were hallucinated.

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • ? Gast

                        2/

                        Russia & Putin
                        Putin deluded himself that AI-enabled warfare will solve his manpower problems & population bottlenecks. 1.3 million dead soldiers so far in Ukraine.
                        https://www.neimagazine.com/news/putin-links-nuclear-buildout-to-russias-ai-ambitions/

                        https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/putin-wanted-ai-supremacy-now-russia-is-struggling-to-stay-in-the-race-0e0deeb6

                        https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/how-technophobe-putin-led-russia-to-surrender-in-the-ai-arms-race-xk6hrn96l

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Gast
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #85

                        @Npars01

                        Need more evidence? Evil.

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                          UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Gast
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #86

                          @mttaggart I'd have more respect for them if they replaced it with a retraction page. But then, I have low expectations for Ars.

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • monkee@other.liM monkee@other.li shared this topic
                          Antworten
                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                          • Älteste zuerst
                          • Neuste zuerst
                          • Meiste Stimmen


                          • Anmelden

                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                          • Erster Beitrag
                            Letzter Beitrag
                          0
                          • Kategorien
                          • Aktuell
                          • Tags
                          • Beliebt
                          • World
                          • Benutzer
                          • Gruppen