Skip to content
  • Kategorien
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Beliebt
  • World
  • Benutzer
  • Gruppen
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Standard: (Kein Skin)
  • Kein Skin
Einklappen

other.li Forum

  1. Übersicht
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's going on here?

What's going on here?

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
86 Beiträge 47 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

    What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

    https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Gast
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #71

    @mttaggart this seems so unlike Benji Edwards, I'm really surprised

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • ? Gast

      4/

      https://arlenegoldbard-1818.medium.com/flood-the-zone-25e592e1fc39

      https://www.vice.com/en/article/steve-bannon-jan-6-trial-arguments/

      https://www.wral.com/this-infamous-steve-bannon-quote-is-key-to-understanding-americas-crazy-politics/19984533/

      https://www.persuasion.community/p/trumps-firehose-of-falsehood

      Pam Bondi's performance in congressional hearings was an excellent example of Russian-style media manipulation.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firehose_of_falsehood

      Firehosing & automation
      https://mediamanipulation.org/definitions/distributed-amplification/

      https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/14/6/391

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Gast
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #72

      @Npars01

      Bondi's rendition looked more like the classic (and abhorent) cartoon version of hysterical female pms. Not how to impress the board in the western world. These women Trump goes for are all broken and the men stupid.

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • ? Gast

        @mttaggart @catsalad wait, was there *any* truth in there whatsoever? Like, it sounds like it was 100% made up?

        Just like the Daily Mail is known for?

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Gast
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #73

        @http_error_418 @mttaggart @catsalad No, I saw the original Git page yesterday and there was a blog post from him after.

        It's a mess, but it's real.

        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • ? Gast

          @bnys @mttaggart Yep, when you add the Transphobic pieces a few year back and Aurich moderation that tends to let the polite fascist slide while banning people calling out fascist, they lost my sub, which Siracusa had earned them.

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Gast
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #74

          @Sobex @bnys @mttaggart
          and while this was a faster response than the trans hit piece of a couple years ago, it's the same playbook: lock comments, promise an investigation, and hope it dies down over the weekend.
          A pity really. A place I used to value. For me, the anti-trans piece was the end.

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • ? Gast

            @mttaggart i expect better from kyle; i do not trust benj edwards at all. between him and eric berger doing free pr for elon musk ars is in a sorry state right now

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Gast
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #75

            @bnys @mttaggart Berger is an embarassment

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

              UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Gast
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #76

              @mttaggart

              They surely pulled it and it now has their moonshark 404 page, the moonshark ate the AI slop.

              Edit: since the story itself was about an AI agent, we can dub this a clusterfuck.

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Gast
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #77

                @mttaggart

                More like ArseTechnica, am I right?

                @arstechnica

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • ? Gast

                  @mttaggart ALAS, THE MOONSHARK HAS EATEN YOUR LINK.

                  mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #78

                  @inpc Keep reading the thread friendo

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                    Aaand the full comments thread from the original story: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name.1511649/

                    ? Offline
                    ? Offline
                    Gast
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #79

                    @mttaggart did you archive that?

                    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                      What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                      https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Gast
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #80

                      @mttaggart@infosec.exchange dead internet theory is true again

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • ? Gast

                        @mttaggart so, ars technica is now merely slop as well?

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Gast
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #81

                        @mttaggart ah:

                        We are doing an investigation right now to figure out exactly what happened. Given that it's Friday afternoon we probably won't have something to report back until Monday, but we will follow up with an explanation for our readers. Edit: Monday is a holiday, my bad, and I don't know what we'll be able to say, so I don't want to over-promise anything.

                        OK, we’ll wait and see…

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                          What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                          https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Gast
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #82

                          @mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                          Hey remember in 2022 when
                          @arstechnica@mastodon.social published a story about a hoax which the source they used admitted was a hoax but they wrote the article as if it was real? That article is still up.
                          https://web.archive.org/web/20250921080857/https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/11/oculus-co-founder-makes-a-vr-headset-that-can-literally-kill-you/

                          RE: https://transfem.social/notes/ae7rksgrr9t400e0

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                            Aaand the full comments thread from the original story: https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name.1511649/

                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Gast
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #83

                            @mttaggart Fuck! I thought that was real

                            mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • ? Gast

                              @mttaggart Fuck! I thought that was real

                              mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #84

                              @staringatclouds The event is real. The quotes in the story were hallucinated.

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • ? Gast

                                2/

                                Russia & Putin
                                Putin deluded himself that AI-enabled warfare will solve his manpower problems & population bottlenecks. 1.3 million dead soldiers so far in Ukraine.
                                https://www.neimagazine.com/news/putin-links-nuclear-buildout-to-russias-ai-ambitions/

                                https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/putin-wanted-ai-supremacy-now-russia-is-struggling-to-stay-in-the-race-0e0deeb6

                                https://www.thetimes.com/world/europe/article/how-technophobe-putin-led-russia-to-surrender-in-the-ai-arms-race-xk6hrn96l

                                ? Offline
                                ? Offline
                                Gast
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #85

                                @Npars01

                                Need more evidence? Evil.

                                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                  UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Gast
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #86

                                  @mttaggart I'd have more respect for them if they replaced it with a retraction page. But then, I have low expectations for Ars.

                                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • monkee@other.liM monkee@other.li shared this topic
                                  Antworten
                                  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                  Anmelden zum Antworten
                                  • Älteste zuerst
                                  • Neuste zuerst
                                  • Meiste Stimmen


                                  • Anmelden

                                  • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                  • Erster Beitrag
                                    Letzter Beitrag
                                  0
                                  • Kategorien
                                  • Aktuell
                                  • Tags
                                  • Beliebt
                                  • World
                                  • Benutzer
                                  • Gruppen