Skip to content
  • Kategorien
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Beliebt
  • World
  • Benutzer
  • Gruppen
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Standard: (Kein Skin)
  • Kein Skin
Einklappen

other.li Forum

  1. Übersicht
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's going on here?

What's going on here?

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
86 Beiträge 47 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

    What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

    https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Gast
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #28

    @mttaggart Seems they took it down. Just wow.

    1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
    0
    • ? Gast

      @mttaggart @mhoye Looks like @arstechnica just pulled the article.

      mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
      mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
      mttaggart@infosec.exchange
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #29

      @HitokiriEric @mhoye @arstechnica Maybe, but Pepperidge Farm remembers: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

        What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

        https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

        mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
        mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
        mttaggart@infosec.exchange
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #30

        UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

        ? ? mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM ? ? 10 Antworten Letzte Antwort
        0
        • ? Gast

          @mttaggart @glyph @jalefkowit correction: I *can* think of one, and it's "they accidentally quoted from the hit-piece blog articles instead"

          But they didn't do that, those don't contain the quotes either.

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Gast
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #31

          @SnoopJ @mttaggart @glyph Looks like the article has been completely deleted.

          Aurich said in the comments before it vanished that they were aware of the issue and looking into it. I assume the findings were pretty dire.

          https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

            What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

            https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Gast
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #32

            @mttaggart archive dot org link since they took it down: https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
            0
            • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

              UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Gast
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #33

              @mttaggart Crap, they DID?! I still have it open! Anything you want before it goes into the void?

              mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • ? Gast

                @mttaggart Crap, they DID?! I still have it open! Anything you want before it goes into the void?

                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #34

                @hackillu https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

                ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                  UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                  ? Offline
                  ? Offline
                  Gast
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #35

                  @mttaggart a "we have hallucinated too and have pulled the article that was here before" would have been better. Good thing you saved it.

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                    UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #36

                    This scoop brought to you by the TTI Intel Feed, which also routinely beats commercial threat intel to the punch on important emerging threats.

                    https://intel.taggartinstitute.org/

                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                      @hackillu https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Gast
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #37

                      @mttaggart And thus we close it.

                      ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • ? Gast

                        @mttaggart And thus we close it.

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Gast
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #38

                        @mttaggart I got the comments though.

                        mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • ? Gast

                          @mttaggart I got the comments though.

                          mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #39

                          @hackillu Nice!

                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                            UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                            ? Offline
                            ? Offline
                            Gast
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #40

                            @mttaggart of course they did, but now they'll need to explain how they managed to let that get published

                            1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                              UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Gast
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #41

                              @mttaggart I suppose one thing you can say about old newspapers - no one can pretend an article was never printed

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                                catsalad@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                catsalad@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
                                catsalad@infosec.exchange
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #42

                                @mttaggart So it was a double slop article? -_-

                                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                  What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                                  https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Gast
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #43

                                  @mttaggart https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

                                  mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • ? Gast

                                    @mttaggart https://arstechnica.com/civis/threads/journalistic-standards.1511650/

                                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #44

                                    @drsbaitso Was just about to post this, thank you.

                                    ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                      @drsbaitso Was just about to post this, thank you.

                                      ? Offline
                                      ? Offline
                                      Gast
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #45

                                      @mttaggart Also, this is not a good situation. Ars has some serious explaining to do.

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                        UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Gast
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #46

                                        @mttaggart I happened to be reading in the comment section before the article got pulled.
                                        Here is Aurich's last post saying the article was pulled and they're going to be investigating, but there probably won't be any answers until Monday and they'll update readers then.

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • catsalad@infosec.exchangeC catsalad@infosec.exchange

                                          @mttaggart So it was a double slop article? -_-

                                          mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                          mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #47

                                          @catsalad Slop on slop on slop. Literally.

                                          ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen


                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Kategorien
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Beliebt
                                          • World
                                          • Benutzer
                                          • Gruppen