Skip to content
  • Kategorien
  • Aktuell
  • Tags
  • Beliebt
  • World
  • Benutzer
  • Gruppen
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Standard: (Kein Skin)
  • Kein Skin
Einklappen

other.li Forum

  1. Übersicht
  2. Uncategorized
  3. What's going on here?

What's going on here?

Geplant Angeheftet Gesperrt Verschoben Uncategorized
86 Beiträge 47 Kommentatoren 0 Aufrufe
  • Älteste zuerst
  • Neuste zuerst
  • Meiste Stimmen
Antworten
  • In einem neuen Thema antworten
Anmelden zum Antworten
Dieses Thema wurde gelöscht. Nur Nutzer mit entsprechenden Rechten können es sehen.
  • ? Gast

    @SnoopJ@hachyderm.io @glyph@mastodon.social @jalefkowit@vmst.io @mttaggart@infosec.exchange I am disappointed, although not surprised, that my read on Benj's work at Ars turned out to the accurate one in recent years. Bleh.

    ? Offline
    ? Offline
    Gast
    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
    #22

    @aud very rude of him to fall off so strongly immediately after I defended his work to you

    ? ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
    0
    • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

      What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

      https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Gast
      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
      #23

      @mttaggart

      Seeing the absolute shit shoveling going on that counts for producing content at Ars over the past well...10-15 years at this point...

      I'm not sure anyone should be following them let alone paying them subscription money.

      That they are now using AI to write their articles is the least surprising thing ever. What a catastrophic fall from grace.

      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
      0
      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

        What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

        https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Gast
        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
        #24

        @mttaggart @mhoye Looks like @arstechnica just pulled the article.

        mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
        0
        • ? Gast

          @aud very rude of him to fall off so strongly immediately after I defended his work to you

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Gast
          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
          #25

          @SnoopJ@hachyderm.io One explanation I can think of is that an editor or Conde Nast higher up generated this using the author's bylines, without their involvement.

          I would not put it past Conde Nast.

          ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
          0
          • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

            What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

            https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Gast
            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
            #26

            @mttaggart i expect better from kyle; i do not trust benj edwards at all. between him and eric berger doing free pr for elon musk ars is in a sorry state right now

            ? ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
            0
            • ? Gast

              @SnoopJ@hachyderm.io One explanation I can think of is that an editor or Conde Nast higher up generated this using the author's bylines, without their involvement.

              I would not put it past Conde Nast.

              ? Offline
              ? Offline
              Gast
              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
              #27

              @SnoopJ@hachyderm.io but if his work had been good (which I was not familiar with before I started reading his articles that smacked increasingly more of boosterism) before... well, it certainly seems to fall into the pattern that people are seeing with regards to LLM usage (trusting it more and more without checking, etc).

              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
              0
              • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                ? Offline
                ? Offline
                Gast
                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                #28

                @mttaggart Seems they took it down. Just wow.

                1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                0
                • ? Gast

                  @mttaggart @mhoye Looks like @arstechnica just pulled the article.

                  mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                  #29

                  @HitokiriEric @mhoye @arstechnica Maybe, but Pepperidge Farm remembers: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                  1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                  0
                  • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                    What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                    https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                    mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                    #30

                    UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                    ? ? mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM ? ? 10 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                    0
                    • ? Gast

                      @mttaggart @glyph @jalefkowit correction: I *can* think of one, and it's "they accidentally quoted from the hit-piece blog articles instead"

                      But they didn't do that, those don't contain the quotes either.

                      ? Offline
                      ? Offline
                      Gast
                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                      #31

                      @SnoopJ @mttaggart @glyph Looks like the article has been completely deleted.

                      Aurich said in the comments before it vanished that they were aware of the issue and looking into it. I assume the findings were pretty dire.

                      https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                      0
                      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                        What's going on here? The matplotlib maintainer this story is about correctly notes that all the quotes from his post in the article are made up.

                        https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name

                        ? Offline
                        ? Offline
                        Gast
                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                        #32

                        @mttaggart archive dot org link since they took it down: https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                        0
                        • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                          UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                          ? Offline
                          ? Offline
                          Gast
                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                          #33

                          @mttaggart Crap, they DID?! I still have it open! Anything you want before it goes into the void?

                          mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                          0
                          • ? Gast

                            @mttaggart Crap, they DID?! I still have it open! Anything you want before it goes into the void?

                            mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                            schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                            #34

                            @hackillu https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

                            ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                            0
                            • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                              UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                              ? Offline
                              ? Offline
                              Gast
                              schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                              #35

                              @mttaggart a "we have hallucinated too and have pulled the article that was here before" would have been better. Good thing you saved it.

                              1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                              0
                              • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                                schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                #36

                                This scoop brought to you by the TTI Intel Feed, which also routinely beats commercial threat intel to the punch on important emerging threats.

                                https://intel.taggartinstitute.org/

                                mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                0
                                • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                  @hackillu https://web.archive.org/web/20260213194851/https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/02/after-a-routine-code-rejection-an-ai-agent-published-a-hit-piece-on-someone-by-name/

                                  ? Offline
                                  ? Offline
                                  Gast
                                  schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                  #37

                                  @mttaggart And thus we close it.

                                  ? 1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                  0
                                  • ? Gast

                                    @mttaggart And thus we close it.

                                    ? Offline
                                    ? Offline
                                    Gast
                                    schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                    #38

                                    @mttaggart I got the comments though.

                                    mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM ? 2 Antworten Letzte Antwort
                                    0
                                    • ? Gast

                                      @mttaggart I got the comments though.

                                      mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mttaggart@infosec.exchange
                                      schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                      #39

                                      @hackillu Nice!

                                      1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                      0
                                      • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                        UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                                        ? Offline
                                        ? Offline
                                        Gast
                                        schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                        #40

                                        @mttaggart of course they did, but now they'll need to explain how they managed to let that get published

                                        1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                        0
                                        • mttaggart@infosec.exchangeM mttaggart@infosec.exchange

                                          UPDATE: They pulled the story, but I had it up and had SingleFile in my browser, so: https://mttaggart.neocities.org/ars-whoopsie

                                          ? Offline
                                          ? Offline
                                          Gast
                                          schrieb zuletzt editiert von
                                          #41

                                          @mttaggart I suppose one thing you can say about old newspapers - no one can pretend an article was never printed

                                          1 Antwort Letzte Antwort
                                          0
                                          Antworten
                                          • In einem neuen Thema antworten
                                          Anmelden zum Antworten
                                          • Älteste zuerst
                                          • Neuste zuerst
                                          • Meiste Stimmen


                                          • Anmelden

                                          • Anmelden oder registrieren, um zu suchen
                                          • Erster Beitrag
                                            Letzter Beitrag
                                          0
                                          • Kategorien
                                          • Aktuell
                                          • Tags
                                          • Beliebt
                                          • World
                                          • Benutzer
                                          • Gruppen